Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Association between negative emotion and interpersonal sensitivity among patients in methadone maintenance treatment / 中华预防医学杂志
Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine ; (12): 705-709, 2015.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-270008
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To analyze interpersonal sensitivity level and influencing factors among patients in methadone maintenance treatment.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From 2010 June to 2011 June, the research was performed in Center of Methadone Maintenance Treatment of Nanjing Baixia District Hospital. A total of 272 methadone maintenance treatment was studied using a self-designed questionnaire, interpersonal sensitivity scale in symptom check list (SCL-90), self-rating depression scale (SDS), self-rating anxiety scale (SAS). If interpersonal sensitivity level ≥ 2 points, it was positive. In this study, through independent sample t test, analysis of the social demographic characteristics, depression and anxiety, interpersonal sensitivity level. Non conditional logistic regression analysis was used to explore a variety of factors, and the relationship of these factors with interpersonal sensitivity.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The depression score, the anxiety score and the level of interpersonal relationship sensitivity in 272 methadone maintenance treatment (1.65 ± 0.51, 47.66 ± 8.58, 42.38 ± 9.40) was higher than the national norm (1.65 ± 0.51, 41.88 ± 10.57, 29.78 ± 0.46) (t values were 8.23, 17.63 and 22.27, respectively; all P values < 0.001). In 272 methadone maintenance treatment, the percentage of men was 75.0% (204/272) and the percentage of women was 25.0% (68/272). SDS score of male and female was (48.38 ± 8.30) and (45.90 ± 9.34) points (t = 5.67, P = 0.037); Aged 20-29, 30-39, 40-49 and ≥ 50 years old group, SDS scores were (48.26 ± 7.59), (47.73 ± 8.38), (47.79 ± 9.22) and (48.09 ± 6.33) points (F = 3.90, P = 0.046); According to the drug's time, divided into 1-3, 4-6 and ≥ 7 years group, SDS scores were (45.92 ± 7.47), (47.41 ± 7.57) and (48.07 ± 8.57) points (F = 4.49, = 0.039). SAS score of male and female was (41.21 ± 9.53) and (42.91 ± 9.42) points (t = 2.23, P = 0.043). The positive rate of interpersonal sensitivity was 47.1% (128/272). Multivariate analysis showed that, with SDS and SAS scores increased by 1, respectively, interpersonal sensitivity increased 23.23 (8.62-96.68) and 11.97 (6.42-19.27) points.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Interpersonal sensitivity level in methadone maintenance treatment was higher than normal and depression; anxiety and depression both were the risk factors of interpersonal sensitivity level.</p>
Asunto(s)
Texto completo: Disponible Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) Asunto principal: Ansiedad / Psicología / Encuestas y Cuestionarios / Factores de Riesgo / Usos Terapéuticos / Depresión / Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos / Relaciones Interpersonales / Metadona Tipo de estudio: Estudio diagnóstico / Estudio de etiología / Factores de riesgo Límite: Adulto / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Chino Revista: Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Artículo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: Disponible Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) Asunto principal: Ansiedad / Psicología / Encuestas y Cuestionarios / Factores de Riesgo / Usos Terapéuticos / Depresión / Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos / Relaciones Interpersonales / Metadona Tipo de estudio: Estudio diagnóstico / Estudio de etiología / Factores de riesgo Límite: Adulto / Femenino / Humanos / Masculino Idioma: Chino Revista: Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Artículo