Comparison of homemade and imported HbsAg ELISA kits on screening blood samples / 中华实验和临床病毒学杂志
Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Virology
;
(6): 84-86, 2006.
Artículo
en Chino
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-305517
ABSTRACT
<p><b>BACKGROUND</b>To evaluate homemade and imported HbsAg ELISA kits on screening blood donors.</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Samples for evaluation included 120 HbsAg serum plates for the golden criteria and 400 sets of serum from blood donors in Dongguan. The samples underwent blind screening with homemade and imported ELISA kits respectively.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>The sensitivity of homemade (Xinchuang) and imported (Diasorin) HbsAg ELISA kit were 85.71% (72/84) and 100% (84/84), respectively. Their specificity was 100% (436/436) and 96.55% (421/436) respectively. The consistency of two ELISA kits was 100%.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The imported ELISA kit had the highest sensitivity, but its specificity was not as good as that of homemade ELISA kit. The two kinds of ELISA kits had good repetition. The combination of the two reagents may ensure the safety of blood transfusion.</p>
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental)
Asunto principal:
Juego de Reactivos para Diagnóstico
/
Estándares de Referencia
/
Sangre
/
Donantes de Sangre
/
Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática
/
China
/
Tamizaje Masivo
/
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
/
Sensibilidad y Especificidad
/
Diagnóstico
Tipo de estudio:
Estudio diagnóstico
/
Estudio pronóstico
/
Estudio de tamizaje
Límite:
Humanos
País/Región como asunto:
Asia
Idioma:
Chino
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Experimental and Clinical Virology
Año:
2006
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS