Comparison of perioperative outcome after endovascular repair between symptomatic and asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm / 中华外科杂志

ABSTRACT

<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the perioperative outcome after endovascular repair (EVAR) of symptomatic abdominal aneurysms (S-AAAs) and elective non-symptomatic AAAs (E-AAAs).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>From January 2008 to February 2013, a total of 230 non-ruptured AAA patients treated by EVAR met the inclusion criteria. S-AAAs were present in 43 (18.7%) patients, 40 patients were male, 3 patients were female, aged (69 ± 10) years and E-AAAs in 187 (81.3%) patients, 162 of which were male, the other 25 patients were female, aged (71 ± 9) years. Patients were followed up at 1 month after EVAR. The primary outcome of the study was perioperative mortality, secondary outcome included procedural data and major perioperative adverse events.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>At baseline, there were no differences in age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification score, and basic diseases. S-AAA patients had larger aneurysms on average (6.00 (1.97) cm vs. 5.10 (1.7) cm, Z = 2.51, P = 0.01). S-AAA patients had shorter preoperative hospitalization (5.00 (5.0) days vs. 7.00 (4.0) days, Z = 1.86, P = 0.02). No differences in the perioperative mortality, respectively, 0 and 1.1% (P = 0.66). Technical success and clinical success were all 100% and the other procedure data was similar (P > 0.05). The occurrence of major adverse events, including mortality, within the 30-day after EVAR were similar between S-AAA and E-AAA patients (0 vs. 2.1%, P = 0.43).</p><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b>There is no difference in perioperative outcome between S-AAA and elective E-AAA patients treated by EVAR. More study is needed to compare the middle and long-outcome between S-AAAs and E-AAAs after EVAR.</p>