Safety and efficiency of pacing at right ventricular outflow versus at ventricular cardiac apex / 中华心血管病杂志
Chinese Journal of Cardiology
;
(12): 726-728, 2008.
Artículo
en Chino
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-355903
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To compare the safety and efficiency of pacing at right ventricular outflow versus right ventricular apex.</p><p><b>METHOD</b>Patients were divided into two groups pacing at ventricular cardiac apex (common pacing group, n = 22) and pacing at right ventricular outflow tract (uncommon pacing group, n = 18).</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>Impedance and amplitude of R-wave were similar during implantation between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The pacing threshold and electric current were significant higher in uncommon group than those in common pacing group (all P < 0.05), however, these differences disappeared at 1 month post pacemaker implantation (all P > 0.05). The mean QRS duration tended to be shorter in uncommon pacing group compared to that in common pacing group (P > 0.05). There was no pacemaker associated adverse effect in both groups.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>The safety and efficiency of pacing at right ventricular outflow was similar as those of pacing at right ventricular apex.</p>
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental)
Asunto principal:
Gasto Cardíaco
/
Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial
/
Estudios de Seguimiento
/
Función Ventricular Derecha
/
Electrocardiografía
/
Ventrículos Cardíacos
/
Métodos
Tipo de estudio:
Estudio observacional
/
Estudio pronóstico
/
Factores de riesgo
Límite:
Adulto
/
Anciano
/
Femenino
/
Humanos
/
Masculino
Idioma:
Chino
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Cardiology
Año:
2008
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS