Bibliometric analysis and quality evaluation of the papers published in Chinese Journal of Trauma from 2003 to 2007 / 中华创伤杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To study the related literature information of the core journal, Chinese Journal of Trauma, in 2003-2007 and evaluate its academic quality. Methods Analysis on literature information and quality evaluation were performed based on the A total of 1 708 related papers were selected from 60 issues of the journal from 2003 to 2007 to evaluate the quality of the journal in seven aspects. Re-suits (1) Average publication capacity index was 0.38 in five years. (2) The major sources of the au-thors were from medical universities or their affiliated hospitals and provincial or military medical units. (3) The major types of the papers were scientific researches, original articles and experience exchange (71.0%). (4) There were 326 grant-based projects, accounting for 35.9% of scientific researches and o-riginal articles. (5) There were average 10.2 quotations in each paper, including 72.2% of foreign docu-mentation, 27.8% Chinese documentation and 6.4% serf-citation. (6) Of all, 684 (75.3%) scientific researches and original articles applied statistical analysis. (7) Of all, 756 (87.4%) scientific researches and original articles were issued with English abstracts. Conclusion Chinese Journal of Trauma has the superiority in above seven aspects, which confirms its quality as a core journal.