Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Six Therapeutic Schemes for Upper Urinary Tract Infections / 中国药房
China Pharmacy
;
(12): 343-344, 2001.
Artículo
en Chino
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-410272
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the economic effectiveness of different pharmacotherapeutic schemes for the same disease.METHODS: Using pharmacoeconomical cost-effectiveness analysis, six schemes for upper urinary tract infections were compared.RESULTS: The total effective rate and cost were both the lowest in group B(70.00% ).The cost-effectiveness ratios of A, B, C, D, E, F were 28.60、 19.13、 43.27、 29.99、 43.02、 29.14, respectively.They became 23.65、 18.01、 34.00、 24.87、 33.91、 24.20 by sensitivity.CONCLUSION: The A and F were both the most inexpensive and effective schemes.
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental)
Tipo de estudio:
Evaluación Económica en Salud
Idioma:
Chino
Revista:
China Pharmacy
Año:
2001
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS