Clinical observation of tubal pregnancy treated by suspended laparoscope / 中国基层医药

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the efficacy of suspended laparoscope and traditional laparotomy in the treatment of tubal pregnancy.Methods 160 cases of tubal pregnancy were treated by traditional laparotomy (A group,n =100) and suspended laparoscope(B group,n =60).The curative effect was compared between the two groups.Results In group B,the operation time was (45.70 ± 3.76) min,the volume of bleeding during the operation was (29.10 + 6.17) ml,anal exhaust time after operation was (17.70 + 7.75) h,post-operative off-bed time was (23.13 ± 7.55) h,postoperative hospitalization time was (4.52 ± 1.10) d,postoperative pain observed in 12 cases,10 cases had postoperative fever,postoperative poor wound healing in 0 case.Those in group A were (47.01 ± 3.83)min,(40.07 ±6.02)m1,(23.90 ±7.86)h,(27.87 +9.06)h,(6.26 ± 1.14) d,38 cases,35 cases,9 cases,the differences between the two groups were statistically significant(t =2.1101,11.0477,4.8568,3.4022,9.4835,x2 =5.6199、6.1961、4.1521,P ＜0.01).The decline of blood human chorionic gonadotropin had no significant difference between the two groups after operation.Conclusion Suspended laparoscope in treatment of tubal pregnancy is better than traditional laparotomy,it is effective,minimally invasive and safe.