Academic level of papers on systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics and methodology they used / 中华医学图书情报杂志
Chinese Journal of Medical Library and Information Science
;
(12): 55-60, 2013.
Artículo
en Chino
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-440021
ABSTRACT
Objective To assess the academic level of papers on systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in Chinese Journal of Pediatricsand methodology they used.Methods Basic data were extracted from 13 papers on sys-tematic reviews and meta-analysis published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics .The methodology they used was assessed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) and ANSTAR Scale and analyzed using the RevMan5.0.Results The PRISMA score was 14-23.5 (mean 20.0±3.11) and the AMSTAR score was 3-7.5 (mean 6.04±1.38) for the methodology used in papers on systematic reviews and meta-analysis published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics .Conclusion The methodology used in papers on systematic reviews and meta-analy-sis published in Chinese Journal of Pediatrics is not quite valid and should thus be improved .
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental)
Tipo de estudio:
Revisiones Sistemáticas Evaluadas
Idioma:
Chino
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Medical Library and Information Science
Año:
2013
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS