Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of effects of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl on median effective concentration of propofol required for inducing respiratory depression / 中华麻醉学杂志
Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology ; (12): 940-943, 2013.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-442850
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the effects of dexmedetomidine and fentanyl on the median effective concentration (EC50) of propofol required for inducing respiratory depression.Methods ASA physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ patients,aged 30-50 yr,weighing 50-75 kg,with body mass index of 22-28 kg/m2,scheduled for elective gynecological surgery under general anesthesia,were randomly divided into 3 groupscontrol group (group C),dexmedetomidine group (group D) and fentanyl group (group F).Dexmedetomidine 0.5 μg/kg and fentanyl 1.5 μg/kg in 10ml of normal saline were infused over 10 min in D and F groups,respectively,while the equal volume of normal saline was given in group C.Lidocaine was injected intravenously followed by target-controlled infusion of propofol.In C,D and F groups,the initial target concentration of propofol was 2.5,2.1 and 1.1 μg/ml,respectively,and the ratio between the two successive concentration gradients was 1.1.It was defined as positive when patients developed respiration depression.EC50 and 95% confidence interval of propofol inducing respiratory depression were calculated.BIS values and OAA/S scores were recorded after admission to operating room (T0),after infusion of dexmedetomidine,fentanyl or normal saline,at 5 and 10 min after the start of propofol target-controlled infusion and after the target effect-site and plasma concentrations were balanced.Results EC50 (95% confidence interval) of propofol required for inducing respiratory depression was 2.72 (2.55-2.91),2.15 (2.05-2.27)and 1.17(1.08-1.25) μg/ml in C,D and F groups,respectively.Compared with group C,the EC50 was significantly decreased in D and F groups and the BIS values and OAA/S scores were increased in group F (P < 0.05),and no significant changes were found in the BIS values and OAA/S scores in group D (P > 0.05).The EC50 was significantly decreased and the BIS values and OAA/S scores was increased in group F as compared with group D (P < 0.05).When the BIS values reached 65 or OAA/S scores was 3,the effect-site concentration was significantly lower in D and F groups than in group C (P < 0.05).In C,D and F groups,the percentage of patients who developed upper airway obstruction caused by glossocoma was 100%,60% and 20%,respectively,and who developed decreased respiratory rate or apnea (RR≤ 8 bpm or respiratory arrest time≥ 15 s) was 0,40% and 80%,respectively.Conclusion Although dexmedetomidine induces no respiratory depression,dexmedetomidine can enhance the potency of propofol required for inducing respiratory depression and the prtency is lower than that of small-dose fentanyl.

Texto completo: Disponible Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) Idioma: Chino Revista: Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Artículo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: Disponible Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) Idioma: Chino Revista: Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology Año: 2013 Tipo del documento: Artículo