Posterior Cruciate Ligament: Focus on Conflicting Issues
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery
;
: 256-262, 2013.
Artículo
en Inglés
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-44831
ABSTRACT
There is little consensus on how to optimally reconstruct the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and the natural history of injured PCL is also unclear. The graft material (autograft vs. allograft), the type of tibial fixation (tibial inlay vs. transtibial tunnel), the femoral tunnel position within the femoral footprint (isometric, central, or eccentric), and the number of bundles in the reconstruction (1 bundle vs. 2 bundles) are among the many decisions that a surgeon must make in a PCL reconstruction. In addition, there is a paucity of information on rehabilitation after reconstruction of the PCL and posterolateral structures. This article focused on the conflicting issues regarding the PCL, and the scientific rationales behind some critical points are discussed.
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental)
Asunto principal:
Fenómenos Biomecánicos
/
Ligamento Cruzado Posterior
/
Resultado del Tratamiento
/
Procedimientos Ortopédicos
/
Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica
/
Articulación de la Rodilla
Tipo de estudio:
Estudio pronóstico
Límite:
Humanos
Idioma:
Inglés
Revista:
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery
Año:
2013
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS