Comparative clinical study of nasojejunal and jejunostomy tube implants / 中国肿瘤临床
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
;
(24): 1163-1165, 2014.
Artículo
en Chino
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-454488
ABSTRACT
Objective:
To evaluate the intestinal trophic effects and adverse reactions of nasojejunal and jejunostomy tube im-plants on patients with total gastrectomy.Methods:
A total of 86 patients with advanced gastric cancer were randomly and equally di-vided into two groups. Groups A and B received enteral nutrition therapies through nasojejunal and jejunostomy feeding tube implants, respectively. The therapeutic efficacy of the two methods of enteral nutrition therapy and the corresponding adverse reactions observed in the two groups were compared.Results:
Group B patients demonstrated shorter anal evacuation and defecation times than group A patients, the difference is statistically significant (P0.05). Nonetheless, the patients in group B tolerated the treatment well compared with those in group A (P0.05).Conclusion:
Patients subjected to total gastrecto-my showed higher tolerance to jejunal tube implants for enteral nutrition than to nasojejunal tube implants, indicating that jejunal tube implants can be used to improve the nutritional status of patients.
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental)
Idioma:
Chino
Revista:
Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
Año:
2014
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS