Compare target controlled infusion with man controlled infusion of propofol in pain-free endoscopic ultrasonography / 中国医师进修杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the effect of target controlled infusion (TCI) and man controlled infusion (MCI) of propofol in pain-free endoscopic ultrasonography.Methods Sixty patients undergoing pain-free endoscopic ultrasonography were divided into TCI group and MCI group by random digits table method,each group 30 patients.Operation time,dose of propofol,time to loss consciousness and recovery time were recorded.The level of mean artery pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded before induction (T0),before operation (T1),5 min afteroperafion (T2) and 5 min afterawake (T3).Cases with bucking,aspiration,laryngeal spasm,pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) lower than 0.90,MAP lower than 50 mmHg (1 mmHg =0.133 kPa) and HR lower than 50 bpm were recorded.Results Dose of propofol was higher in MCI group than that in TCI group,time to loss consciousness was shorter in MCI group than that in TCI group,recovery time was shorter in TCI group than that in MCI group,there was significant difference (P ＜ 0.01).The level of MAP and HR on T1 were significantly lower than those on T0 between two groups (P ＜ 0.05).The level of MAP and HR on T1 in TCI group were signifcantly higher than those in MCI group (P ＜ 0.05).The rate of bucking between two groups had no significant difference (x2 =0.37,P ＞ 0.05).The rate of anoxemia in TCI group was 10.0％ (3/30),in MCI group was 66.7％ (20/30),there was significant difference (x2 =20.38,P ＜ 0.01).The rate ofMAP lower than 50 mmHg in TCI group was 6.7％ (2/30),in MCI group was 30.0％ (9/30),there was significant difference (x2 =5.46,P ＜ 0.05).The rate of HR lower than 50 bpm between two groups had no significant difference (x2 =3.35,P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion Compared with MCI,patients induced by TCI mode are more stable in blood pressure,and more safe.