Effects of Clostridium butyricum combined with glutamine on the expression of intestinal tight junction protein in stress mouse model / 中华消化杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To investigate the mechanism of the permeability of intestinal mucosa in the pathogenesis of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and the interventional effects of Clostridium butyricum combined with glutamine.Methods According to random number method,fifty BALB/c mice were divided into control group,experimental control group,glutamine group,Clostridium butyricum group and combination group.IBS mice model was established by water-avoidance stress (WAS) experiment.The defecating time of mice and fecal water content were detected by dyed stool after mice gavaged with methylcellulose (1.5％).The pathological injury of intestine was assessed by hematoxylin and eosin staining.The visceral sensitivity was evaluated by colorectal distention test (CRD).The changes of the permeability of intestine was evaluated by detecting the changes of serum D-lactic acid (D-LA),level of diamine oxidase (DAO),expressions of intestinal epithelial cells (IEC) cell tight junction protein (TJ) (occludin-1,claudin-1,zonula occludens-1 (ZOL-1)) at protein level.The interventional effects of Clostridium butyricum combined with glutamine were evaluated.t test was performed for comparison between groups,and analysis of variance was used for comparison among multi-groups.Results Compared with the control group,the defecating time of experimental control group was significantly shorten ((100.40±14.80) min vs (75.88±12.20) min and water content of fecal significantly increased ((54.76±9.98)％ vs (74.95±7.15)％,t =3.692 and 4.023; P=0.002 and 0.002).The lowest threshold of visceral sensitivity significantly decreased ((40.87 ± 4.82) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa) vs (27.80±3.18) mmHg; t=8.761,P＜0.01),while the mucosal pathological injury score significantly increased (0.50±0.15 vs2.60±0.97; t＝6.034,P＜0.01).The level of D-LA ((1 476±246.8) ng/L vs (913.6±90.1) ng/L)) and DAO ((3 391.0±256.9) vs (5 096.0±725.2) ng/L) significantly increased (t=40.920 and 29.810; both P＜0.05),and the expression of tight junction protein ZOL-1 (0.165±0.005 vs0.119±0.003),occludin-1 (0.104±0.016 vs 0.022±0.006) significantly decreased (t=19.830 and 19.830; both P＜0.01).Compared with the experimental control group,after intragastric intervention the defecating time of glutamine group,Clostridium butyricum group and combination group increased ((90.50±3.78),(97.56±8.79) and (99.89±11.90) min and water content of fecal decreased ((69.33±6.71)％,(58.07±8.97)％ and (56.74±8.12)％) and the differences were statistically significant (F=10.020 and 8.740; both P＜0.01).The results of Clostridium butyricum group and combination group were good (F=2.481 and 4.874; both P＜0.05).And the lowest threshold of visceral sensitivity significantly increased ((31.80±2.69),(36.04±5.06) and (38.93±3.30) mmHg; F=2.420,P＜0.05),the result of combination group was the best (F=3.550,P＜0.01).Jejunal mucosal injury was significantly reduced (2.00 ± 0.94,1.30 ± 0.68 and 1.30±0.48; F＝11.350,P＜0.01).After intragastric intervention,serum levels of D-LA ((1 370.0± 78.9),(1 066.0±155.5) and (1 039.0±129.0) ng/L) and DAO ((4 808.0±477.4),(3 713.0± 595.0) and (3 725.0±615.9) ng/L) of glutamine group,Clostridium butyricum group and combination group significantly decreased (F＝37.480 and 27.670; both P＜0.01).The level of ZOL-1(0.126± 0.014,0.125±0.006,0.138±0.004) and occludin 1 (0.037±0.013,0.073±0.028,0.078±0.027) of glutamine group,Clostridium butyricum group and combination group significantly increased,and the differences were statistically significant (F=5.867 and 10.630; both P＜0.05).The change of ZOL-1 of combination group was more than that of Clostridium butyricum group (t =5.457,P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions WAS experiment can induce visceral hypersensitivity,increase the permeability of intestine and reduce the function of intestinal epithelial barrier.Clostridium butyricum and glutamine are effective in the recovery of visceral hypersensitivity and the permeability of mucosal epithelia cells.