A comparative study of three maxillofacial trauma scoring systems in mandible fracture grading / 实用口腔医学杂志
Journal of Practical Stomatology
;
(6): 68-72, 2015.
Artículo
en Chino
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-462075
ABSTRACT
Objective:
To compare 3 maxillofacial trauma scoring systems in mandible fracture grading.Methods:
Maxillofacial Injury Severity Score(MISS),Maxillofacial Injury Severity Score(MFISS),Mandible Injury Severity Score(S5)were used in the analysis of mandible fracture severity in 313 cases with mandible fractures.The results were statistically analyzed.Results:
S5 score showed higher correlation with operation time,operation charge and hospitalization expenses than MFISS and MISS,and it could distinguish single and multiple mandible fractures effectively.It was also a significant factor affecting the cost of hospitalization.Conclusion:
The Mandible Injury Severity Score was more suitable for the scoring of mandible fracture.
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental)
Idioma:
Chino
Revista:
Journal of Practical Stomatology
Año:
2015
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS