Acute closed rupture of the Achilles tendon：a Meta-analysis of nonsurgical and surgical treatment / 中国组织工程研究

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:There is always a controversy about nonsurgical and surgical repair of acute Achiles tendon rupture. Except retrospective analysis, there is a lack of high-level evidence-based medicine data. OBJECTIVE:To systemicaly evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the nonsurgical versus surgical treatment for acute closed rupture of the Achiles tendon. METHODS:The randomized controled trials about the nonsurgical versus surgical treatment for acute Achiles tendon rupture were searched in PubMed, EMbase, CBM, CNKI, Ovid, and WanFang Data by computer as wel as in relevant journals by hand, which were reported before February 2014. The Cochrane Library (Issue 1, 2014) was also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and evaluated the methodological quality according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Then Meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.2 Software. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Nine randomized controled trials were included, and totaly 874 patients were involved, 441 cases in the nonsurgical group and 433 in the surgical group. The results of Meta-analysis showed that compared with the surgical group, the incidence of complications was lower [OR=0.41, 95%CI(0.26, 0.63), P< 0.000 1], but the rate of tendon re-rupture [OR=2.86, 95%CI(1.62, 5.02),P=0.000 2] and incidence of cicatricial adhesion [OR=0.07, 95%CI(0.03, 0.19),P < 0.000 1] were higher in the nonsurgical group. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in patient satisfaction, superficial infection, motion recovery, and deep infection. Compared with the surgical treatment, the nonsurgical treatment can reduce the incidence of complications, but has a higher incidence of re-rupture. Because of sample-size and methodological quality restrictions, this conclusion needs further verification of large-sample, multicenter, and high-quality randomized controled trials.