The effects compare analysis of different moist environment for treating severely burned patients / 中国综合临床

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the effects of different moist environment for treating severely burned patients.Methods From November 2009 to December 2014 in the Burn Unit of Hainan General Hospital, 170 hospitalized patients with severe burns were randomly equally divided into observation group and control group.The patients of control group were treated with the traditional wet therapy treatment, while of the observation group were given the closed moist therapy treatment.The wound healing, pain relief and adverse reactions were observed.Results All patients completed the treatment,and the cure rates at the 7th and 14th day of treatment in the treatment group were 80.0％ (68/85) and 97.6％ (83/85), significantly higher than those of the control group (52.9％ (45/85), 89.4％ (76/85), x2 =8.344,4.111, P ＜ 0.05).The number of dressing changes((7.44±2.39) times), cumulative dressing time ((45.98 ± 13.29) min) and wound healing time ((14.98±4.33)d) in the observation group were significantly less than those in the control group((11.76 ±3.14) times, (87.03 ± 14.99) min), (18.87 ± 5.13) d)), the differences were statistically significant (t =6.349,6.540,3.111, P＜0.05).After treatment, the pain scores were showed clear downward trend, with had significant difference compared before treatment (P＜0.05), while the pain scores at the 7th day((3.10± 1.34) scores) and 14th day((1.76±0.67) scores) of treatment in the treatment group were significantly lower than the control group((4.09±0.89) scores, (3.11±0.56) scores, P＜0.05).The incidence of adverse events during treatment in both groups were 5.9％, obviously improved after symptomatic treatment.Conclusion The moist environment conducive to the treatment of severely burned patients, and safety.Conclusion to traditional wet therapy, closed moist therapy has better cure rate of severe burns, can promote wound healing, relieve pain and shorten the dressing cycle time.