Results of false lumen status of different methods for aortic arch treatment in Stanford A aortic dissection / 中华胸心血管外科杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To analyze the effect of the false lumenstatus of different methods in a single center.Methods From January 2010 to December 2015,391 cases of acute Stanford A aortic dissection were treated in our center.139 cases(of which 108 malesand 31 females) were finally selected after excluding the cases who died during hospitalization,whose perioperative clinical data were incomplete,follow-up information were incomplete,and DeBakey type Ⅱ aortic dissection and the cases with descending aorta dilatation.The average age was(50.3 ± 11.6) years(22-76 years).According to the methods for aortic arch and descending aorta,139 cases were divided into 5 groups:24 cases in AR(including ascending aorta replacement,ascending aorta + hemi-arch replacement and ascending aorta + island-arch replacement),9 cases in AR + SET (including ascending aorta + hemi-arch replacement + stent elephant trunk and ascending aorta + island-arch replacement + stent elephant trunk),42 cases in Arch + SET(ascending aorta + arch replacement + stent elephant trunk),22 cases in AR + TBS (ascending aorta + triple branched stent) and 42 cases in AR + FS(ascending aorta + arch fenestrated stent).Statistical analysis the size of true lemen and the status of false lumen among these five groups in the level of aortic arch,the distal end of stent,diaphragm,celiac artery,renal artery and iliacartery postoperatively.Results Different levels of descending aorta in each group have showed arying degrees of true lumen open and thrombosisof false lumen during follow-up period.Among them,cases with aortic arch treatment and stent implantation have showed higher ratio of thrombosis of false lumen.Effects of different stents were similar,which all promoted the process of thrombosis of false lumen.Conclusion Three methods for aortrc arch and desc ending aorta repair including Cronus (R),triple branched stent and arch fenstrafed stent had similar clinical aortic false lumen closure rate.Three methods had similar long term effect.