Comparison of blind intubation through supraglottic devices and direct laryngoscopy by novices: a simulation manikin study
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
;
(4): 75-80, 2016.
Artículo
en Inglés
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-644627
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
This study aimed to compare intubation performance between blind intubation through supraglottic airway devices and direct laryngoscopy by novices under manikin simulation. We hypothesized that the intubation time by novices using supraglottic airway devices was superior to that with the Macintosh laryngoscope (MCL).METHODS:
A prospective, randomized crossover study was conducted with 95 participants, to evaluate i-gel, air-Q, LMA Fastrach, and MCL devices. Primary outcomes were the intubation time and the success rate for intubation.RESULTS:
The i-gel showed the shortest insertion and tube passing time among the four devices; the i-gel and air-Q also showed the shortest total intubation time (all P<0.0083; i-gel vs. air-Q, P=0.03). The i-gel and MCL showed the highest cumulative success rate (all P<0.0083; i-gel vs. MCL, P=0.12).CONCLUSION:
Blind intubation through the i-gel showed almost equal intubation performance compared to direct laryngoscopy.
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental)
Asunto principal:
Estudios Prospectivos
/
Máscaras Laríngeas
/
Estudios Cruzados
/
Laringoscopios
/
Manejo de la Vía Aérea
/
Intubación
/
Laringoscopía
/
Maniquíes
Tipo de estudio:
Ensayo Clínico Controlado
/
Estudio observacional
Idioma:
Inglés
Revista:
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine
Año:
2016
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS