Comparative Study of ACL Double-bundle Reconstruction with and without Functional Knee Brace: Minimum 1-year Follow-up Results / 대한정형외과학회잡지
The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
;
: 738-745, 2008.
Artículo
en Coreano
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-646479
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
To compare the clinical efficacy after an arthroscopic ACL double-bundle reconstruction with and without functional knee brace. MATERIALS ANDMETHODS:
Between July 2004 and May 2006, fifty patients who underwent an ACL double-bundle reconstruction with and without a functional knee brace for more than a 1-year follow-up were evaluated. The patients were treated with brace (Group 1, 22 cases) or without (Group 2, 28 cases) a brace after surgrey. Stability was assessed by maximal manual testing with a KT-1000 arthrometer, anterior stress radiographs using the Telos device and a lateral pivot shift test. The clinical results were assessed by the OAK (Orthopadische Arbeitsgruppe Knie) score, IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) score, mid thigh circumference and the range of motion.RESULTS:
More than one year after surgery, average of OAK score, IKDC score, lateral pivot shift test of the stability results and maximal manual testing with the KT-1000 arthrometer, stress radiographs with the Telos device, mid thigh circumference difference, range of motion of the clinical results were similar in both groups.CONCLUSION:
An ACL double-bundle reconstruction produces similar stability and clinical results regardlness of whether or not a functional knee brace is used.
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental)
Asunto principal:
Muslo
/
Tirantes
/
Estudios de Seguimiento
/
Rango del Movimiento Articular
/
Rodilla
Tipo de estudio:
Guía de Práctica Clínica
/
Estudio observacional
/
Estudio pronóstico
Límite:
Humanos
Idioma:
Coreano
Revista:
The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
Año:
2008
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS