Clinical Outcome after Septic versus Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty / 대한정형외과학회잡지
The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
;
: 72-77, 2008.
Artículo
en Coreano
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-648169
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of septic and aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty. MATERIALS ANDMETHODS:
This study compared the clinical and radiographic results of 12 septic and 10 aseptic revisions. All septic revisions were treated with two-stage reimplantation using an articulating cement spacer. The range of motion, Knee Society score, WOMAC score, and radiographic results of the American Knee Society were assessed.RESULTS:
The preoperative data, which included the average range of motion, Knee Society score, WOMAC score and femoro-tibial angle, were similar in both groups. At the final follow-up, the average range of motion was similar in the two groups 102.5degrees in the septic revisions, and 114.5degrees in the aseptic revisions (p=0.070). In addition, the Knee Society score, WOMAC score and femoro-tibial angle were similar in both groups. There was no loosening or failure of either component observed in any case. A patellar tendon rupture was observed in one septic revision after surgery.CONCLUSION:
Two-stage reimplantation using an articulating cement spacer in septic revisions could achieve functional results that are compatible to aseptic revisions.
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental)
Asunto principal:
Artroplastia
/
Reimplantación
/
Rotura
/
Estudios de Seguimiento
/
Rango del Movimiento Articular
/
Ligamento Rotuliano
/
Rodilla
Tipo de estudio:
Estudio observacional
/
Estudio pronóstico
Idioma:
Coreano
Revista:
The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
Año:
2008
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS