Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison with Traditional Open Surgery / 대한정형외과학회잡지
The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
;
: 288-296, 2006.
Artículo
en Coreano
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-655121
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
To compare the the clinical and radiographic results of the two approaches for posterior lumbar fusion, one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) performed with a minimally invasive approach or the traditional open approach. MATERIALS ANDMETHODS:
This study examined a consecutive series of 46 patients who underwent one-level PLIF procedure (27 cases performed with minimally invasive approach and 19 cases with traditional open approach) by one surgeon at one hospital. The following data were compared with a minimum 1-year follow-up the clinical and radiographic results, surgical time, estimated blood loss, transfusion requirements, postoperative back pain, time needed before ambulation, length of hospital stay, and complications.RESULTS:
There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of the clinical and radiographic results at the last follow-up. The minimally invasive group was found to have a less blood loss, fewer transfusion requirements, less postoperative back pain, a shorter recovery time, and a shorter hospital stay. However, minimally invasive group required a longer surgical time and there were 2 cases with technical complications.CONCLUSION:
This study confirmed the favorable results reported by previous uncontrolled cohort studies. It also showed that the minimally invasive approach had a similar surgical efficacy to that of traditional open approach. However, minimally invasive technique requires a steep learning curve and attention in order to lower the risk of complications.
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental)
Asunto principal:
Estudios de Cohortes
/
Estudios de Seguimiento
/
Caminata
/
Dolor de Espalda
/
Curva de Aprendizaje
/
Tempo Operativo
/
Tiempo de Internación
Tipo de estudio:
Estudio de etiología
/
Estudio de incidencia
/
Estudio observacional
/
Estudio pronóstico
/
Factores de riesgo
Límite:
Humanos
Idioma:
Coreano
Revista:
The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
Año:
2006
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS