Underestimate the histologic grade by biopsy preoperative in bladder urotheliai carcinoma / 中华泌尿外科杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To compare the histologic grade between biopsy and postoperative specimen in bladder urothelial carcinoma,and approach the state and the reasons of underestimate the histologic grade preoperative.Methods We retrospectively 82 cases of urothelial carcinoma at the Third Affiliated Hospi- tal of the Sun Yat-Sen University.For all the cases in this study,the histologic grade,using the 1998 World Health Organization and International Society of Urological Pathologists(WHO/ISUP)classification,was i- dentical when the biopsy specimen and postoperative specimen were compared.Results In this study,35 cases,28 cases and 19 cases were G_1、G_2、G_3 by biopsy preoperative,respectively;while 22 cases,32 cases、28 cases were G_1、G_2、G_3 postoperative,respectively.There were 24 cases(29.3%)underestimate the histo- logic grade by biopsy preoperative in the 82 cases,while 4 cases(4.9%)overestimate preoperative.The state of underestimate the histologic grade is correlated with the location of biopsy,tissue dose and the conser- vation of pathology judgment.Conclusions There were 24 cases(29.3%)underestimate the histologic grade by biopsy preoperative.We should pay more attention to this state of underestimate the histologic grade preoperative in the treatment of bladder urothelial carcinoma.