Application of PICCO in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome complicated with septic shock caused by severe pneumonia / 中华急诊医学杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To explore the clinical value of pulse indicates continuous cardiac output (PICCO) in fluid resuscitation of patients with ARDS complicated with septic shock caused by severe pneumonia. Methods Thirty-nine ARDS patients complicated with septic shock caused by severe pneumonia were divided into two groups, namely PICCO group and control group. The data of demographics and clinical findings of both groups were collected. At the same time, the data of serum lactic acid, Pa02/Fi02, MAP, the volume of fluid input, the amount of vasoactive agent, APACHE Ⅱ Scores of both groups at 6 hours and 24 hours after admission were collected, and the data of EVLWI, PVPI, CI, SVRI, GEDVI in PICCO group were documented at admission and 24 hours later, as well as the duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the respiratory ICU and 30-day mortality were recorded. SPSS software of version 21.0 was used to statistically analyze the data. Results ① There were no statistically significant differences in in age, gender, APACHEII score and other relevant physiological parameters between two groups.② Compared with control group at 6 h and 24 h, the PICCO-guided treatment significantly reduced the level of Lac, elevated the MAP value and decreased the volume of fluid input (all P＜0.05) At the same time, this approach improved 24 h-Pa02/ Fi02(P=0.001).More importantly, the PICCO-guided treatment significantly reduced the duration of mechanical ventilation[(8.83 ± 3.57) vs (13.54 ± 4.06)d, P=0.000],shortened the stay in the respiratory ICU[(10.12 ± 4.46) vs (14.10 ± 5.65)d,P=0.020]and decreased the 30d mortality 15.79％ vs 50％,p=0.041. ③ In PICCO group, EVLWI and PVPI were significantly decreased[(12.27 ± 4.42) vs (16.11 ± 5.99) mL/ kg,P=0.028; (3.66 ± 1.71) vs (6.88 ± 2.93) mL/m2, P=0.000]; respectively and SVRI and GEDVI were significantly increased[(1212.70 ± 304.10) vs (958.50 ± 192.40)kPa·s/(min·m2),P=0.004; (676.57 ± 77.86) vs (616.33 ± 57.49)mL/(min · M2),P=0.010]; respectively at 24h compared those at admission. Conclusions Compared with conventional fluid resuscitation, PICCO-oriented treatment can quickly improve the relevant physiological parameters, direct the fluid resuscitation more accurately, shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation as well as the stay in ICU, and decrease the 30d mortality in patients with ARDS complicated with septic shock caused by severe pneumonia. Therefore, PICCO-oriented fluid resuscitation has noticeable clinical value, and be worthy of further clinical application especially in this kind of patients.