Analysis of 22 cases of forensic psychiatric illness / 中国法医学杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective To explore the problems that should be paid attention to during the process of the identification of the mental illness of the judiciary.Methods The process and conclusion of 22 cases of forensic psychiatric expertise were reviewed and analyzed in the Department of psychiatric disorders,Beijing Anding Hospital,Capital Medical University from August 1,1982 to July 31,2016.The analysis indexes mainly include(1) the time of the implementation of the identification;(2) the matters entrusted by the Commission;(3) the identification materials provided by the client;(4) the conclusion of the appraisal.Results (1) from July 31,1999 to August 1,1982,7 cases were identified from to August 1,1999,and 15 cases were identified from to July 31,2016.(2) from August 1,1982 to July 1999 31 during the day mainly identification issues for 6 cases (85.7％,6/7) mental state and the ability of criminal responsibility and 1 cases (14.3％,1/7) mental state and sexual self defensive ability,from August 1,1999 to July 2016 31 during the day in 15 cases of all matters for identification of mental state and civil capacity.(3) including the authentication materials provided by a clientPrevious expert opinions and description of mental state of medical records,effective during the testimony of witnesses and / or detention,public security organs information records,audio-visual materials.(4) most of the identified people can be identified in the clinical diagnosis of mental illness and to determine the legal capacity,individual identification can not come to the conclusion.Conclusion The identification number and the difficulty of life;for his identification of civil capacity increased;should focus on ensuring the identification data of the authenticity,integrity,adequacy and validity;"conclusion" is also a kind of expert conclusion,it is suggested to use three cent method civil capacity rating was identified.