Comparison between Cementless and Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis / 대한고관절학회지
Hip & Pelvis
;
: 241-253, 2018.
Artículo
en Inglés
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-740440
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
This study was conducted to compare cemented and cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures via meta-analysis and systematic review of relevant studies. MATERIALS ANDMETHODS:
Systematic review and meta-analysis were performed on 31 available clinical studies; 19 of these studies used cemented stems, 12 used cementless stems, one used both types of stems, and two studies involved a comparative analysis of both stem types.RESULTS:
There were statistically significant differences in rates of leg length discrepancy (LLD) greater than 1 cm between the cemented (event rate, 0.089) and cementless groups (event rate, 0.015 and 0.047; P=0.03).CONCLUSION:
Cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty and cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty performed on elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fracture revealed similar mortality and complication rates; however, the rate of LLD greater than 1 cm was significantly higher in the cemented group compared with the cementless group.
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental)
Asunto principal:
Mortalidad
/
Hemiartroplastia
/
Cadera
/
Fracturas de Cadera
/
Pierna
/
Diferencia de Longitud de las Piernas
Tipo de estudio:
Estudio pronóstico
/
Revisiones Sistemáticas Evaluadas
Límite:
Anciano
/
Humanos
Idioma:
Inglés
Revista:
Hip & Pelvis
Año:
2018
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS