Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
ADCMin ,ADCDR and DCE-MRI in the differential diagnosis of breast ductal carcinoma in situ and breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion / 实用放射学杂志
Journal of Practical Radiology ; (12): 1768-1773, 2019.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-789941
ABSTRACT
Objective To explore the differential diagnosis of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)and breast ductal carcinoma in situ with microinvasion (DCIS-Mi)by ADCMin ,ADCDR and DCE-MRI,and to analyze the correlation between DCIS-Mi and biological factors. Methods Preoperative breast MRI examinations were performed in 41 patients with DCIS-Mi and 3 7 patients with DCIS.DCIS-Mi and DCIS patients were compared in terms of ADCMin ,ADCMax ,ADCDR ,early enhancement rate (EER)and the morphological characteristics of DCE-MRI.The optimal diagnostic variables were determined by binary Logistic regression,the threshold value of the optimal diagnostic variables was ensured by ROC,and the correlation between DCIS-Mi and biological factors was analyzed by Spearman.Results ADCMin of DCIS-Mi patients was lower than that of DCIS (t=6.294,P=0.033),and ADCDR was higher than that of DCIS (t=9.246,P=0.020).70.7 3% DCIS-Mi showed non-tumor-like enhancement,inclined to segmental distribution,and internal heterogeneous or cluster ring enhancement;29.27% manifested tumor-like enhancement,internal heterogeneous or ring enhancement,and unclear margin.64.86% DCIS showed non-tumor-like enhancement,inclined to linear distribution,internal homogeneous/heterogeneous enhancement;35.14% expressed tumor-like enhancement,internal homogeneous enhancement,and clear margin.The accuracy,sensitivity and specificity of ADCMin , ADCDR ,tumor or non-tumor internal enhancement features in the diagnosis of DCIS-Mi were higher (84.0%,9 5.3%,9 2.4%;89.3%, 9 5.3%,9 2.4%;85.1%,9 2.5%,9 3.8%;87.4%,9 6.8%,84.7%, respectively).ADCMin and ADCDR threshold value were 1.1 1× 10-3 mm2/s and 0.35×10-3 mm2/s,respectively.ADCMin of patients with DCIS-Mi was positive correlation with ER(-)and PR(-), and negative correlation with HER-2(+)(P<0.05).ADCDR ,non-tumor distribution,and non-tumor internal enhancement characteristics,the tumor edge and internal enhancement characteristics were negative correlation with ER(-)and PR(-),and positive correlation with HER-2 (+)(P<0.05).Conclusion ADCMin ,ADCDR and DCE-MRI can be used for the differential diagnosis of DCIS-Mi and DCIS, and provided evidence for clinical treatment plan.

Texto completo: Disponible Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) Tipo de estudio: Estudio diagnóstico Idioma: Chino Revista: Journal of Practical Radiology Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Artículo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: Disponible Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) Tipo de estudio: Estudio diagnóstico Idioma: Chino Revista: Journal of Practical Radiology Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Artículo