Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Rapid Health Technology Assessment for Effectiveness ,Safety and Economics of Ginkgo biloba Extract in the Treatment of Alzheimer ’s Disease / 中国药房
China Pharmacy ; (12): 2786-2790, 2020.
Article en Zh | WPRIM | ID: wpr-829983
Biblioteca responsable: WPRO
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:To rapidly evaluate the effectiveness ,safety and economics of Ginkgo biloba extract(EGb)in the treatment of Alzheimer ’s disease (AD)patients,and to provide evidence-based reference for clinical drug selection and decision. METHODS:Retrieved from PubMed ,Embase,Cochrane Library ,Web of Science ,CNKI,CBM,Wanfang database ,health technology assessment (HTA)organization websites and database during the inception to Aug. 10,2020,HTA reports ,systematic reviews/Meta-analysis,and pharmacoeconomic studies of EGb versus placebo in the treatment of AD were collected. After literature screening and data extration ,HTA checklist ,AMSTAR-2 scale and CHEERS scale were used respectively to evaluate the literature quality of the included HTA report ,systematic review/Meta-analysis and pharmacoeconomics studies. The conclusion of the included studies were summarized by using qualitative description. RESULTS :A total of 9 literatures were included ,involving 8 systematic reviews and 1 economic studies. In terms of effectiveness ,there was no statistical significance in MMSE score of EGb group,ADAS-Cog score of 120 mg EGb group ,compared with placebo group (P>0.05). Dementia Quality of Life (DQoL)score of EGb group was significantly higher than that of placebo group. The scores of short cognitive aptitude tests ,neuropsychiatric inventory(NPI),NPI caregiver version score ,ADAS-Cog score of 160 mg EGb group and 240 mg EGb group were significantly lower than those of control group (P<0.05). ADL scores of patients were inconsistent ;ADL scores of EGb group were significantly lower than those o f placebo group (P<0.05),or there was no significant diff erence between 2 groups(P>0.05); . subgroup analysis by dose showed that there was no RDY2019-39) significant difference in ADL score between 120 mg EGb group and placebo group (P>0.05);ADL score of 240 mg E-mail:renxiaolei83@126.com EGb group were signicantly lower than that of placebo group (P<0.05). Subgroup analysis of clinical global impression 010-88325751。E-mail:lyi1267@126.com change (CGIC) score showed that there was no significant difference in CGIC score between EGb group and placebo group after receiving <200 mg EGb and 26 weeks of treatment (P> 0.05);CGIC score of EGb group was significantly higher than that of placebo group after receiving >200 mg EGb and 24 weeks of treatment (P<0.05). In terms of safety ,there was no statistical significance in the incidence of ADR or the incidence of severe ADR between EGb group and placebo group (P>0.05). Subgroup analysis by dose showed that the incidence of ADR in 240 mg EGb group was significantly higher than placebo group (P<0.05). Economically ,EGb treatment for AD is cost-effective ,which could indirectly save the nursing costs of AD patients. CONCLUSIONS :The efficacy of EGb in the treatment of AD is uncertain , and the safety and economy are good.
Palabras clave
Texto completo: 1 Índice: WPRIM Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation / Health_technology_assessment / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: Zh Revista: China Pharmacy Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article
Texto completo: 1 Índice: WPRIM Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation / Health_technology_assessment / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Idioma: Zh Revista: China Pharmacy Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article