Biomechanical comparison of single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis
The Journal of Korean Knee Society
;
: e14-2020.
Artículo
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-834993
ABSTRACT
Methods@#The electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for relevant articles comparing the outcomes of SB-ACLR versus DB-ACLR that were published until November 2019. @*Results@#Seventeen biomechanical studies were included. The anterior laxity measured using the anterior drawer test showed significantly better results in DB-ACLR when compared with SB-ACLR. In addition, outcomes of the anterior tibial translation test under a simulated pivot shift presented with better results at low flexion and 30° in DB-ACLR, compared with SB-ACLR. However, there were no significant biomechanical differences between the groups in internal rotation. @*Conclusions@#The present study demonstrated that both techniques for ACLR are associated with restoration of normal knee kinematics. DB-ACLR is superior to SB-ACLR in terms of restoration of anteroposterior stability.However, which technique yields better improvement in internal rotation laxity, and internal rotation laxity under a simulated pivot shift at a specific angle, remains unclear.Level of evidence This is a level II meta-analysis.
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental)
Tipo de estudio:
Revisiones Sistemáticas Evaluadas
Revista:
The Journal of Korean Knee Society
Año:
2020
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS