HPLC-ELSD fingerprint of Zhenwu Decoction and simultaneous determination of 13 components / 中草药

ABSTRACT

Objective: To establish HPLC-ELSD fingerprint of Zhenwu Decoction(ZWD), screen out the signature components of ZWD through chemical pattern recognition, so as to establish the content determination method of ZWD based on this index. Methods: The fingerprint of 16 batches of ZWD was established by HPLC-ELSD method. The similarity evaluation system of traditional Chinese medicine chromatographic fingerprint (2012 Version) was used for similarity evaluation to determine the common peaks and its attribution. Cluster analysis (CA), principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) were used to select the index components of ZWD. Results: The fingerprint of ZWD was established, 38 common peaks were confirmed, and the similarity was > 0.95. The results of CA, PCA and OPLS-DA were consistent and the samples were divided into three categories. Benzoylmesaconine, benzoylaconitine, benzoylhypacoitine, polyporenic acid C, pachymic acid, atractylenolide II, atractylenolide III, oxypaeoniflorin, albiflorin, paeoniflorin and benzoylpaeoniflorin were identified as the 11 index components with significant difference contribution in different batches of ZWD samples. 6-Gingerol and 6-shogaol were the main active components of ginger, so the above 13 components were taken as the index components of ZWD. The chromatographic peak separation degree and linear relationship were good. The average recovery rate was 96.46%-99.80%, RSD ≤ 3.15%. The mass fraction range of benzoylmesaconine, benzoylaconitine, benzoylhypacoitine, polyporenic acid C, pachymic acid, atractylenolide II, atractylenolide III, oxypaeoniflorin, albiflorin, paeoniflorin, benzoylpaeoniflorin, 6-gingerol, 6-shogaol in 16 batches were 283.93-576.86, 25.05-147.39, 62.96-303.37, 31.24-131.27, 9.76-44.04, 32.15-83.55, 76.55-333.13, 17.48-146.61, 456.58-1554.14, 3 322.48-5 590.01, 158.21-556.50, 525.85-582.92 and 68.52-74.73 mg/g, respectively. Conclusion: The fingerprint combined with PCA, CA and OPLS-DA can comprehensively evaluate the quality of ZWD. This method is stable and reliable, providing reference for the quality evaluation.