Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Pyeloplasty Using Additional 2 mm Instruments: A Comparison with Conventional Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty
Korean Journal of Urology
;
: 616-621, 2011.
Artículo
en Inglés
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-86494
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE:
Despite a recent surge in the performance of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), concerns remain about performing LESS pyeloplasty (LESS-P) because of the technical difficulty in suturing. We report our techniques and initial experiences with LESS-P using additional needlescopic instruments and compare the results with conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty (CL-P). MATERIALS ANDMETHODS:
Nine patients undergoing LESS-P were matched 21 with regard to age and side of surgery to a previous cohort of 18 patients who underwent CL-P. In both groups, the operating procedures were performed equally except for the number of access points. In the LESS-P group, we made a single 2 cm incision at the umbilicus and used a homemade port. We also used additional 2 mm needlescopic instruments at the subcostal area to facilitate suturing and the ureteral stenting.RESULTS:
The preoperative characteristics were comparable in both groups. Postoperatively, no significant differences were noted between the LESS-P and CL-P cases in regard to length of stay, estimated blood loss, analgesics required, and complications. But, LESS-P was associated with a shorter operative time (252.2 vs. 309.7 minutes, p=0.044) and less pain on postoperative day one (numeric rating scale 3.7 vs. 5.6, p=0.024). The success rate was 94% with CL-P (median, 23 months) and 100% with LESS-P (median, 14 months).CONCLUSIONS:
Our initial experiences suggest that LESS-P is a feasible and safe procedure. The use of additional 2 mm instruments can help to overcome the difficulties associated with LESS surgery.
Texto completo:
Disponible
Índice:
WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental)
Asunto principal:
Ombligo
/
Uréter
/
Obstrucción Ureteral
/
Stents
/
Estudios de Cohortes
/
Laparoscopía
/
Tempo Operativo
/
Analgésicos
/
Tiempo de Internación
Tipo de estudio:
Estudio de etiología
/
Estudio de incidencia
/
Estudio observacional
/
Factores de riesgo
Límite:
Humanos
Idioma:
Inglés
Revista:
Korean Journal of Urology
Año:
2011
Tipo del documento:
Artículo
Similares
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS