Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Minimally invasive treatment with anterograde multiple endoscopes for upper urinary tract stones in allograft kidney / 中华泌尿外科杂志
Chinese Journal of Urology ; (12): 272-278, 2022.
Artículo en Chino | WPRIM | ID: wpr-933211
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To discuss the clinical experience and efficacy of minimally invasive anterograde multiple endoscopic treatment of upper urinary tract stones in allograft kidney.

Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed 14 patients with upper urinary tract stones in allograft kidney admitted to our hospital from June 2018 to August 2020. 8 cases were female and 6 cases were male, with an average age of 47.3±11.1 years. 3 patients had hyperuricemia and four had hypertension and diabetes. The history of renal transplantation was over ten years in 3 cases, three to five years in 4 cases, two years in 3 cases, 1 year in 3 cases, and 4 months in 1 case. 3 patients had a history of RIRS, and the operation was terminated due to severe ureteral tortuosity resulting in failure of sheathing or ureteroscopy. Ureteral stent was performed in 2 cases due to stone obstruction and hydronephrosis. Serum creatinine was normal in 7 patients before operation, and serum creatinine was 91-139μmol/L in 4 patients in the compensatory stage of chronic renal insufficiency. The serum creatinine was 292, 544 and 708μmol/L respectively in 3 patients in the decompensated stage of chronic renal insufficiency or renal failure stage. The preoperative average hemoglobin was 117.5g/L. 3 cases were partial staghorn calculi, 4 cases were single caliceal or renal pelvis calculi, 2 cases were renal pelvis or caliceal calculi with upper ureteral calculi, and 5 cases were renal pelvis or renal caliceal calculi with multiple calculi. Stone size were 1 case of single upper caliceal stone of 0.7cm, 3 cases of lower caliceal stones of 1.5, 1.6 and 2.0cm, 1 case of renal pelvic stone of 1.5cm, 2 cases of middle and upper caliceal stones of 2.8 and 3.1cm, 2 cases of middle and lower caliceal stones of 1.5 and 3.2cm, respectively. 3 cases of middle upper caliceal and renal pelvic stones were 2.2, 2.5 and 2.6cm. 2 cases of renal pelvis with upper ureteral stones were 1.3 and 1.7cm, 0.7 and 0.5cm respectively. Preoperative routine urine examination showed that 9 cases had urinary tract infection, among which 5 cases had positive urine culture. Surgery was performed after therapeutic improvement with sensitive antibiotics. According to the size and distribution of stone, the combination of single access or multi-access PCNL in different diameters was adopted, supplemented by FURS. Surgical methods selection and performance 2 cases performed in single S-PCNL with stone size were 2.2cm and 2.6cm, 2 cases performed in single M-PCNL with stone size were 1.5cm and 1.5cm, 1 case performed in Needle-perc with stone size was 0.7cm, 2 cases performed in S-PCNL combined M-PCNL with stone size were 2.8cm and 3.1cm, 3 cases performed in S-PCNL combined Needle-perc with stone size were 2.0cm, 2.5cm and 3.2cm, 2 cases performed in M-PCNL combined Needle-perc with stone size were 1.5cm and 1.6cm, 2 cases performed in S-PCNL combined anterograde FURS with stones size were 1.3cm and 1.7cm in allograft kidney and ureter stone were 0.7cm and 0.5cm, a total of 7 kinds of way, and postoperative stone free rate, laboratory indexes (serum creatinine, blood hemoglobin), surgical complications, postoperative hospital stay were analyzed.

Results:

All 14 patients (mean age was 47.3±11.1 years) were successfully operated. Postoperative examination revealed 1 case had 0.6cm residual stone and it was cleared at the second stage anterograde FURS through the original access. The mean operative time and postoperative hospital stay were 68.2±21.6min and 6.2±1.3 days. Compared with preoperative serum creatinine changes, 2 cases showed slight increase (mean 12.6±0.3μmol/L), 3 cases showed significant decrease (mean 329.6±216.6μmol/L), and the other 9 cases showed no significant change (range<10μmol/L), among which 5 cases showed an increase (mean 5.4±0.7 μmol/L) and 4 cases showed a decrease (mean 3.7±0.4 μmol/L). The mean decrease of hemoglobin was 9.3±4.1g/L. Two patients had fever and their body temperature returned to normal after anti-inflammatory treatment. No blood transfusion, abdominal organ injury or urogenic sepsis occurred.

Conclusions:

Invasive anterograde multiple endoscopic treatment of upper urinary tract stones in allograft kidney is a single or combined operation using single-channel PCNL, multi-channel PCNL of different sizes and diameters and anterograde FURS according to individual differences, which can effectively reduce renal function injury is safe, efficient and feasible.

Texto completo: Disponible Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) Idioma: Chino Revista: Chinese Journal of Urology Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Artículo

Similares

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texto completo: Disponible Índice: WPRIM (Pacífico Occidental) Idioma: Chino Revista: Chinese Journal of Urology Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Artículo