Medical perspectives on the clinical value of male circumcision

ABSTRACT

Male circumcision (MC) is one of the most common surgical procedures in the world, but its medical benefits remain under debate. In the context of evidence-based medicine, MC is beneficial in reducing the risks of infantile urinary tract infection, viral-mediated sexually transmitted diseases, penile/cervical cancers, and poor hygiene. The claims of opponents against MC, such as reduced sexual performance, psychological trauma, and an excess of complications, are gradually losing credibility. Possibly influenced by US troops stationed in Korea following the Korean War, MC is highly prevalent in South Korea, though it has been losing popularity recently. The practice of MC in Korea is different from that in other countries, in that most cases of MC are performed in adolescence under local anesthesia. Although this eliminates the benefit of reducing urinary tract infection in neonates, it still offers the benefits of reducing the risk of viral sexually transmitted diseases and penile/cervical cancers. Moreover, MC can lead to improved hygiene for the majority of Koreans who are willing to undergo the procedure. The practice of MC in adolescence may reduce the risk of significant complications, though the risk of bleeding may be higher than for neonates.