Comparison of six-month follow-up results of primary percutaneous coronary intervention guided by optical coherence tomography or coronary angiography / 中华心血管病杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare the 6-month follow-up results of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) guided by optical coherence tomography (OCT) or coronary angiography (CAG) alone in a larger ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) cohort. Methods: We enrolled 275 STEMI patients undergoing OCT-guided PPCI from March 2017 through December 2018. Two hundred and seventy-five propensity score matched STEMI patients undergoing CAG-guided PPCI served as control group. The 6-month clinical follow-up results were compared between the two groups. The demographic data, complications, coronary angiography and OCT characteristics were evaluated. Results: OCT evaluation showed that there were 151 patients (54.9%) with plaque prolapse and 113 patients (41.1%) with stent malposition. Proximal and/or distal dissection of stents occurred in 38 patients (13.8%), of which 3 patients (1.1%) had both proximal and distal dissection. Of the 38 patients, 2 patients received rescue stent implantation. Results of clinical follow-up at 6 months showed that there was no significant difference in cardiovascular death, repeat myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization, stroke and hemorrhage endpoint events between OCT-guided PPCI patients and CAG-guided PPCI patients (P=0.682). Conclusion: Clinical events at 6 months are similar between OCT-guided PPCI and CAG-guided PPCI for STEMI patients.