Comparison of four imaging examinations of shoulder joint injury in forensic expertise / 法医学杂志
Journal of Forensic Medicine
; (6): 39-42, 2011.
Article
en Zh
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-983624
Biblioteca responsable:
WPRO
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE@#To compare the value of four imaging examinations, including the X-ray, CT, MRI and gas-iodine double contrast CT analyses, in the forensic expertise of shoulder joint injury.@*METHODS@#Imaging data of shoulder joint injury, by the X-ray, CT, MRI and gas-iodine double contrast CT were retrieved and analyzed.@*RESULTS@#The correct diagnosis rates of fracture and soft tissue injury by X-ray, CT and MRI were 52.8%, 72.0% and 63.2%, as well as 0.0%, 32.9% and 82.5%, respectively. The correct diagnosis rate of soft tissue injury by gas-iodine double contrast CT was 100%.@*CONCLUSION@#X-ray is a useful screening method, CT is better for diagnosis of fracture, and MRI is fit for diagnosis of soft tissue injury. Gas-iodine double contrast CT can reflect not only the soft tissue injury but also its severity. Thus, combined application of X-ray, CT, MRI and gas-iodine double contrast CT can provide important imaging information for forensic expertise in shoulder joint injury.
Texto completo:
1
Índice:
WPRIM
Asunto principal:
Articulación del Hombro
/
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética
/
Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
/
Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo
/
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
/
Estudios Retrospectivos
/
Sensibilidad y Especificidad
/
Traumatismos de los Tejidos Blandos
/
Fracturas Óseas
/
Lesiones del Hombro
Límite:
Adolescent
/
Adult
/
Aged
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
Idioma:
Zh
Revista:
Journal of Forensic Medicine
Año:
2011
Tipo del documento:
Article