The effect of drilling and drainage based on spiral CT-guided on hematoma clearance and serum inflammatory factors levels in patients with basal ganglia region hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage / 中国医师进修杂志

ABSTRACT

Objective:To investigate the effect of drilling and drainage based on spiral CT-guided on hematoma clearance and serum inflammatory factors levels in patients with basal ganglia region hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage.Methods:A total of 112 patients with basal ganglia region hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage admitted to Lanling County People′s Hospital from May 2017 to February 2020 were selected as the research objects, and 56 patients performed traditional craniotomy(craniotomy group), and 56 patients used spinal CT to locate the hematoma area and puncture point before the surgery, and performed drilling and drainage according the scanning results (drilling group). The operation conditions, hematoma volume changes and hematoma clearance rate in two groups were compared. The levels of neuron-specific enolase (NSE), specific protein S100B, interleukin(IL)-17, IL-1β and C-reactive protein (CRP) in two groups before and after the treatment for 1 month were compared. The scores of National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and Barthel Index Scale(BI) in two groups before and after the treatment for 3 months were compared.Results:The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume in the drilling group were lower than those in the craniotomy group (1.21 ± 0.28) h vs. (2.43 ± 0.37) h, (131.98 ± 39.51) ml vs. (231.64 ± 47.65) ml, (41.05 ± 5.68) ml vs. (62.93 ± 7.83) ml; the hematoma clearance rate in the drilling group was higher than that in the craniotomy group (89.57 ± 6.15)% vs. (77.95 ± 5.92)%, there were statistical differences ( P<0.05). After treatment for 1 month, the levels of S100B, NES, IL-17, IL-1β, CRP in the drilling group were lower than those in the craniotomy group (0.49 ± 0.18) μg/L vs. (0.67 ± 0.24) μg/L, (15.32 ± 1.67) μg/L vs. (17.61 ± 1.59) μg/L, (147.38 ± 14.86) ng/L vs. (172.59 ± 12.94) ng/L, (84.17 ± 10.48) ng/L vs. (107.43 ± 9.35) ng/L, (33.78 ± 4.77) mg/L vs. (47.01 ± 4.15) mg/L, there were statistical differences ( P<0.05). After treatment for 3 months, the scores of NIHSS in the drilling group was lower than that in the craniotomy group and the scores of BI in thedrilling group was higher than that in the craniotomy group (3.57 ± 2.13) scores vs. (7.83 ± 2.96) scores, (84.56 ± 8.16) scores vs. (67.43 ± 6.95) scores, there were statistical differences ( P<0.05). The complication rate in the two groups had no statistically differences ( P>0.05). Conclusions:Compared with traditional craniotomy, the drilling and drainage based on spiral CT-guided on hematoma clearance has the advantages of shorter operation time, less injury, better regulation of inflammation and better improvement of neurological function.