Clinical efficacy of modified vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse / 中国基层医药

ABSTRACT

Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy of modified vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse.Methods:A total of 60 patients with uterine prolapse who received treatment in Fengtai County People's Hospital from July 2017 to October 2021 were included in this study. They were divided into control and observation groups ( n = 30/group) according to different treatment methods. The patients in the control group were treated with traditional vaginal hysterectomy (vaginal hysterectomy + vaginal anterior and posterior wall repair). The patients in the observation group were treated with modified vaginal hysterectomy (vaginal hysterectomy + vaginal anterior and posterior wall repair + autologous ligament suspension). The changes in surgical indicators and treatment effectiveness were evaluated between the two groups. All patients were followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months. Vaginal fornix prolapse and quality of life score were compared between the two groups. Results:The average drainage volume, average anal exhaust time, the average time to get out of bed, and the average length of hospital stay in the observation group were (520.13 ± 52.14) mL, (36.47 ± 5.72) hours, (32.48 ± 7.12) hours, and (16.48 ± 2.67) hours, respectively, which were significantly less or shorter than those in the control group ( t = 19.35, 18.25, 17.56, 17.35, all P < 0.05). The total response rate in the observation group was 93.3% (28/30), which was significantly higher than 80.0% (24/30) in the control group ( χ2 = 6.32, P = 0.005). At 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, vaginal fornix prolapse did not occur in any patient in the observation group, but it occurred in two, three, and seven patients in the control group at the corresponding time points. Treatment efficiency was superior in the observation group to that in the control group ( χ2 = 4.21, P = 0.001). At 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, quality of life score in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group [3 months: (60.71 ± 7.58) points vs. (50.69 ± 2.89) points; 6 months: (76.42 ± 3.50) points vs. (63.31 ± 8.67) points; 12 months: (81.30 ± 2.64) points vs. (70.72 ± 6.51) points], and the differences were statistically significant ( t = 7.21, 7.10, 6.31, all P < 0.05). Conclusion:The modified vaginal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterine prolapse has an ideal effect. It can effectively reduce the amount of drainage, shorten the exhaust time and the length of hospital stay, improve quality of life, and thereby is worthy of clinical promotion.