Comparison of two endoscopic spine surgical techniques
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992, Impr.)
;
67(2): 243-247, Feb. 2021. graf
Article
Dans Anglais
| LILACS
| ID: biblio-1287825
ABSTRACT
SUMMARY OBJECTIVE:
The objective of this study is to compare the clinical outcome among patients who are surgically treated for lumbar disc herniation by transforaminal and interlaminar endoscopy techniques.METHODS:
For the treatment of lumbar disc herniation, 31 patients were assigned to undergo the interlaminar technique and 24 patients the transforaminal technique. They were evaluated using visual analog scale and Oswestry disability index in the preoperative period, in the first postoperative period, and in the 12th month after the procedure. The clinical results between the two techniques were then compared.RESULTS:
Overall, 89.1% of the patients obtained good results, with 12.5% complications in the transforaminal technique and 9.6% in the interlaminar technique.CONCLUSION:
Although both the endoscopic techniques, compared in this study, are safe and effective for the surgical treatment of lumbar herniated disc, the interlaminar technique presented significantly better results and lower rates of complications than the transforaminal technique.
Texte intégral:
Disponible
Indice:
LILAS (Amériques)
Sujet Principal:
Discectomie percutanée
/
Déplacement de disque intervertébral
Type d'étude:
Étude observationnelle
Limites du sujet:
Humains
langue:
Anglais
Texte intégral:
Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. (1992, Impr.)
Thème du journal:
EducaÆo em Sa£de
/
GestÆo do Conhecimento para a Pesquisa em Sa£de
/
Médicament
Année:
2021
Type:
Article
Pays d'affiliation:
Brésil
Institution/Pays d'affiliation:
Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade/BR
/
Hospital do Trabalhador/BR
Documents relatifs à ce sujet
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS