Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Less qualitative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer can underestimate extraprostatic extension in higher grade tumors
Schmit, Stephen; Allu, Sai; Tanzer, Joshua Ray; Ortiz, Rebecca; Pareek, Gyan; Hyams, Elias.
  • Schmit, Stephen; Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University. The Minimally Invasive Urology Institute at The Miriam Hospital. Division of Urology. RI
  • Allu, Sai; Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University. The Minimally Invasive Urology Institute at The Miriam Hospital. Division of Urology. RI
  • Tanzer, Joshua Ray; Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University. The Minimally Invasive Urology Institute at The Miriam Hospital. Division of Urology. RI
  • Ortiz, Rebecca; Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University. The Minimally Invasive Urology Institute at The Miriam Hospital. Division of Urology. RI
  • Pareek, Gyan; Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University. The Minimally Invasive Urology Institute at The Miriam Hospital. Division of Urology. RI
  • Hyams, Elias; Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University. The Minimally Invasive Urology Institute at The Miriam Hospital. Division of Urology. RI
Int. braz. j. urol ; 50(1): 37-45, Jan.-Feb. 2024. tab, graf
Article Dans En | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1558039
Responsable en Bibliothèque : BR1.1
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT

Background:

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is increasingly used for risk stratification and preoperative staging of prostate cancer. It remains unclear how Grade Group (GG) interacts with the ability of mpMRI to determine the presence of extraprostatic extension (EPE) on surgical pathology.

Methods:

A retrospective review of a robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) database from 2016-2020 was performed. Radiology mpMRI reports by multiple attending radiologists and without clear standardization or quality control were retrospectively assessed for EPE findings and compared with surgical pathology reports. The data were stratified by biopsy-based GG and a multivariable cluster analysis was performed to incorporate additional preoperative variables (age at diagnosis, PSA, etc.). Hazard ratios were calculated to determine how mpMRI findings and radiographic EPE relate to positive surgical margins.

Results:

Two hundred and eighty nine patients underwent at least one mpMRI prior to RALP. Preoperative mpMRI demonstrated sensitivity of 39.3% and specificity of 88.8% for pathological EPE and had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 49.5%, and positive predictive value (PPV) of 84.0%. Stratification of NPV by GG yielded the following values GG 1-5 (49.5%), GG 3-5 (40.8%), GG 4-5 (43.4%), and GG 5 (30.4%). Additionally, positive EPE on preoperative mpMRI was associated with a significantly decreased risk of positive surgical margins (RR 0.655; 95% CI 0.557-0.771).

Conclusions:

NPV of prostate mpMRI for EPE may be decreased for higher grade tumors. A detailed reference reading and image quality optimization may improve performance. However, urologists should exercise caution in nerve sparing approaches in these patients.


Texte intégral: 1 Indice: LILACS langue: En Texte intégral: Int. braz. j. urol Thème du journal: UROLOGIA Année: 2024 Type: Article

Texte intégral: 1 Indice: LILACS langue: En Texte intégral: Int. braz. j. urol Thème du journal: UROLOGIA Année: 2024 Type: Article