Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Addressing Orthodontic Interventions: Methodological Study
Notaro, Sarah Queiroz; Hermont, Ana Paula; Cruz, Poliana Valdelice; Maia, Raiane Machado; Avila, Walesca Melo; Pericic, Tina Poklepovic; Abreu, Lucas Guimarães; Jiao, Ruimin; Martins-Pfeifer, Carolina Castro.
Affiliation
  • Notaro, Sarah Queiroz; Federal University of Minas Gerais. Dental School. Belo Horizonte. BR
  • Hermont, Ana Paula; Federal University of Minas Gerais. Dental School. Belo Horizonte. BR
  • Cruz, Poliana Valdelice; Federal University of Minas Gerais. Dental School. Belo Horizonte. BR
  • Maia, Raiane Machado; Pontificai Catholic University of Minas Gerais. Dental School. Belo Horizonte. BR
  • Avila, Walesca Melo; Academisch Centrum Tandheelkunde Amsterdam. Amsterdam.
  • Pericic, Tina Poklepovic; University of Split School of Medicine. Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health. Split. HR
  • Abreu, Lucas Guimarães; Federal University of Minas Gerais. Dental School. Belo Horizonte. BR
  • Jiao, Ruimin; China Academy of Chinese Medical Science. Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion. Dongcheng. CN
  • Martins-Pfeifer, Carolina Castro; Federal University of Minas Gerais. Dental School. Belo Horizonte. BR
Pesqui. bras. odontopediatria clín. integr ; 24: e230074, 2024. tab, graf
Article de En | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1558665
Bibliothèque responsable: BR1264.1
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT

Objective:

To assess the methodological quality and characteristics of systematic reviews (SRs) of interventional studies in orthodontics and assess how the certainty of the evidence is reported using the GRADE approach. Material and

Methods:

Six electronic databases were searched, followed by a hand search of the reference lists of eligible studies (PROSPERO #CRD42020180852). The required study design was randomized and nonrandomized studies of interventions published between January 2019 and May 2020. The Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 2) tool was used for the quality appraisal of the included SRs. Paired reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted data, and appraised the methodological quality.

Results:

The study included 46 SRs; 19.5% had moderate to high methodological quality, and the remaining had low to critically low methodological quality. Fifty-four percent of the reviews assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach, and 34.8% followed all GRADE criteria.

Conclusion:

Most reviews had a good judgment of the AMSTAR2 items, although some critical items contributed to decreased overall quality. Half of the reviews used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence, and this approach should be included in future systematic reviews of interventions.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Indice: LILACS Sujet Principal: Appareils orthodontiques / Orthodontie / Revues systématiques comme sujet / Méthodes langue: En Texte intégral: Pesqui. bras. odontopediatria clín. integr Thème du journal: ODONTOLOGIA Année: 2024 Type: Article

Texte intégral: 1 Indice: LILACS Sujet Principal: Appareils orthodontiques / Orthodontie / Revues systématiques comme sujet / Méthodes langue: En Texte intégral: Pesqui. bras. odontopediatria clín. integr Thème du journal: ODONTOLOGIA Année: 2024 Type: Article