Comparative study of pain in women submitted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Acta cir. bras
;
32(6): 475-481, June 2017. tab, graf
Article
Dans Anglais
| LILACS
| ID: biblio-886205
ABSTRACT
Abstract Purpose:
To evaluate postoperative pain in patients submitted to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy with four ports versus single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with only one port.Methods:
Twenty-one patients were included in the conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy group and 19 other patients in the single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy group. A VAS was used for the assessment of postoperative pain at three time points. Differences were considered statistically significant when p<0.05.Results:
Intergroup analysis showed no significant difference in VAS scores between the conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy and single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy groups at any of the time points studied.Conclusion:
This study found no significant difference in postoperative pain between the two groups.
Texte intégral:
Disponible
Indice:
LILAS (Amériques)
Sujet Principal:
Douleur postopératoire
/
Lithiase biliaire
/
Cholécystectomie laparoscopique
Type d'étude:
Essai clinique contrôlé
/
Étude observationnelle
/
Étude de prévalence
/
Facteurs de risque
Limites du sujet:
Adulte
/
Femelle
/
Humains
langue:
Anglais
Texte intégral:
Acta cir. bras
Thème du journal:
Chirurgie générale
/
Procedimentos Cir£rgicos Operat¢rios
Année:
2017
Type:
Article
Pays d'affiliation:
Brésil
Institution/Pays d'affiliation:
Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro/BR
Documents relatifs à ce sujet
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS