Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
External dacryocystorhinostomy versus endoscopic non-laser dacryocycstorhinostomy " A comparative study"
Benha Medical Journal. 2004; 21 (1): 58-94
Dans Anglais | IMEMR | ID: emr-172729
ABSTRACT
A retrospective study to compare outcomes after external dacryocystorhinostomy [Ex-DCR] and transnasal endoscopic assisted nonlaser dacryocystorhinostomy [End-DCR]. A total of 214 Ex-DCR performed to 208 operated from the 1996 to 2002 and a total 118 End-DCR of 116 patients were reviewed. The follow up period was at least One year. techniques were performed in each group. Patency of the drainage system was assessed by history and irrigation. A full success was in 86% of Ex-DCR group and 77.1% among End-DCR group by techniques. The operating time, difficulties, postoperative recovery time and complications were compared. The Ex-DCR has a higher success rate compared to the End-D CR. However, End-DCR has a shorter operative time, no external scar es. and more suitable for recurrent cases
Sujets)
Recherche sur Google
Indice: Méditerranée orientale Sujet Principal: Étude comparative / Résultat thérapeutique / Endoscopie / Obstruction du canal lacrymal Limites du sujet: Femelle / Humains / Mâle langue: Anglais Texte intégral: Benha Med. J. Année: 2004

Documents relatifs à ce sujet

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Recherche sur Google
Indice: Méditerranée orientale Sujet Principal: Étude comparative / Résultat thérapeutique / Endoscopie / Obstruction du canal lacrymal Limites du sujet: Femelle / Humains / Mâle langue: Anglais Texte intégral: Benha Med. J. Année: 2004