Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pulpal temperature increase with high-speed handpiece, Er-YAG laser and ultrasound tips
Mollica, Fernanda Brandão; Camargo, Fernanda Pelogia; Zamboni, Sandra Costa; Pereira, Sarina Maciel Braga; Teixeira, Symone Cristina; Nogueira Junior, Lafayette.
  • Mollica, Fernanda Brandão; São Paulo State University. Department of Restorative Dentistry. São Paulo. BR
  • Camargo, Fernanda Pelogia; São Paulo State University. Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics. São Paulo. BR
  • Zamboni, Sandra Costa; São Paulo State University. Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics. São Paulo. BR
  • Pereira, Sarina Maciel Braga; São Paulo State University. Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics. São Paulo. BR
  • Teixeira, Symone Cristina; São Paulo State University. Department of Pediatric Dentistry. São Paulo. BR
  • Nogueira Junior, Lafayette; São Paulo State University. Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics. São Paulo. BR
J. appl. oral sci ; 16(3): 209-213, May-June 2008. ilus, tab
Article Dans Anglais | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-483156
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to compare intrapulpal temperature increase produced by high-speed handpiece, ErYAG laser and CVDentus ultrasound tips during cavity preparation. Thirty bovine mandibular incisors with an enamel/dentin thickness of 4 mm at buccal surface had their roots amputated and were allocated to the following groups (n=10) Group I- high-speed handpiece; Group II- noncontact ErYAG laser (250 mJ/4Hz); and Group III- CVDentus ultrasouns tips. All devices were used with water cooling. Class V cavities were prepared to a depth of 3.5 mm, measured with a periodontal probe. A type T thermocouple was placed inside the pulp chamber to determine the temperature increase (°C), which was recorded by a data acquisition system ADS 2000 IP (Lynx Technology) linked to a notebook computer. Data were analyzed statistically by oneway ANOVA and Tukey’s test (p=0.05). The mean temperature rises were 1.10°C (±0.56) for Group I, 0.84°C (±0.55) for Group II, and 3.00°C (± 1.34) for Group III. There were no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) between Groups I and II, but both of them differed significantly from Group III (p<0.05). In conclusion, the use of ErYAG laser and high-speed handpiece for cavity preparation resulted in similar temperature increase. Although ultrasound tips generated significantly higher intrapulpal temperature increase, it remained below the critical value of 5.5°C and may be considered safe for use.
Sujets)

Texte intégral: Disponible Indice: LILAS (Amériques) Sujet Principal: Préparation de cavité dentaire / Pulpe dentaire Limites du sujet: Animaux langue: Anglais Texte intégral: J. appl. oral sci Thème du journal: Dentisterie Année: 2008 Type: Article Pays d'affiliation: Brésil Institution/Pays d'affiliation: São Paulo State University/BR

Documents relatifs à ce sujet

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texte intégral: Disponible Indice: LILAS (Amériques) Sujet Principal: Préparation de cavité dentaire / Pulpe dentaire Limites du sujet: Animaux langue: Anglais Texte intégral: J. appl. oral sci Thème du journal: Dentisterie Année: 2008 Type: Article Pays d'affiliation: Brésil Institution/Pays d'affiliation: São Paulo State University/BR