Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Endovenous ablation (radiofrequency and laser) and foam sclerotherapy versus conventional surgery for great saphenous vein varices
Nesbitt, Craig; Eifell, Ron K. G.; Coyne, Peter; Badri, Hassan; Bhattacharya, Vish; Stansby, Gerard.
  • Nesbitt, Craig; s.af
  • Eifell, Ron K. G.; s.af
  • Coyne, Peter; s.af
  • Badri, Hassan; s.af
  • Bhattacharya, Vish; s.af
  • Stansby, Gerard; s.af
São Paulo med. j ; 132(1): 69-69, 2014.
Article Dans Anglais | LILACS | ID: lil-699304
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Minimally invasive techniques to treat great saphenous varicose veins include ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (USGFS), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and endovenous laser therapy (EVLT). Compared with conventional surgery (high ligation and stripping (HL/S)), proposed benefits include fewer complications, quicker return to work, improved quality of life (QoL) scores, reduced need for general anaesthesia and equivalent recurrence rates.

OBJECTIVE:

To review available randomized controlled clinical trials (RCT) data comparing USGFS, RFA, EVLT to HL/S for the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins.

METHODS:

Search

methods:

The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases (PVD) Group searched their Specialized Register (July 2010) and CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3). In addition the authors performed a search of EMBASE (July 2010). Manufacturers of EVLT, RFA and sclerosant equipment were contacted for trial data. Selection criteria All RCTs of EVLT, RFA, USGFS and HL/S were considered for inclusion. Primary outcomes were recurrent varicosities, recanalization, neovascularization, technical procedure failure or need for re-intervention, patient quality of life (QoL) scores and associated complications. Secondary outcomes were type of anaesthetic, procedure duration, hospital stay and cost. Data collection and

analysis:

CN, RE, VB, PC, HB and GS independently reviewed, assessed and selected trials which met the inclusion criteria. CN and RE extracted data. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias was used. CN contacted trial authors to clarify details. MAIN

RESULTS:

Thirteen reports from five studies with a combined total of 450 patients were included. Rates of recanalization were higher following EVLT compared with HL/S, both early (within four months) (5/149 versus 0/100; odds ratio (OR) 3.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45 to 32.64) and late recanalization (after four months) ...
Sujets)

Texte intégral: Disponible Indice: LILAS (Amériques) Sujet Principal: Veine saphène / Varices / Sclérothérapie / Ablation par cathéter / Thérapie laser Type d'étude: Essai clinique contrôlé Limites du sujet: Humains langue: Anglais Texte intégral: São Paulo med. j Thème du journal: Cirurgia Geral / Ciˆncia / Ginecologia / Médicament / Medicina Interna / Obstetr¡cia / Pediatria / Sa£de Mental / Sa£de P£blica Année: 2014 Type: Article

Documents relatifs à ce sujet

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Texte intégral: Disponible Indice: LILAS (Amériques) Sujet Principal: Veine saphène / Varices / Sclérothérapie / Ablation par cathéter / Thérapie laser Type d'étude: Essai clinique contrôlé Limites du sujet: Humains langue: Anglais Texte intégral: São Paulo med. j Thème du journal: Cirurgia Geral / Ciˆncia / Ginecologia / Médicament / Medicina Interna / Obstetr¡cia / Pediatria / Sa£de Mental / Sa£de P£blica Année: 2014 Type: Article