Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcome and complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy as primary versus secondary procedure for renal calculi
Reddy, S. V. Krishna; Shaik, Ahammad Basha.
Affiliation
  • Reddy, S. V. Krishna; Narayana Medical College. Department of Urology. Nellore. IN
  • Shaik, Ahammad Basha; Narayana Medical College. Department of Urology. Nellore. IN
Int. braz. j. urol ; 42(2): 262-269, Mar.-Apr. 2016. tab, graf
Article de En | LILACS | ID: lil-782850
Bibliothèque responsable: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Purpose To compare the efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) as a primary procedure of patients following previous open surgery or post percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for renal calculi. Materials and Methods The medical records of 367 patients who underwent PCNL by a single surgeon from January 2008 to December 2013 were reviewed retrospectively. All patients were divided into 3 Groups. Group-1 (n=232) included patients with no history of ipsilateral open stone surgery. Group 2 (n=86) patients had undergone one or more open stone surgeries before PCNL, patients with failed or recurrence following PCNL were placed in Group-3 (n=49). The demographic data, operation duration, stone free rate (SFR), number of attempts to access the collecting system and intra operative and postoperative complications between the three Groups were compared. Results There was no difference in sex, Body Mass Index (BMI), stone burden and laterality among the three Groups. Operation time was significantly less in first Group, while there was a statistically significant difference in operation duration between second and third Groups (p<0.05). The number of attempts to enter the collecting system was lower in the first Group in comparison to other two Groups (p<0.5). There was no significant differences among three groups in stone free rate. Intra operative and postoperative complications were slightly more frequent in Groups 2 and 3. Mortality occurred in 1 patient with colon perforation in Group-2. Conclusion Our study demonstrated that PCNL can be performed in patients even as secondary procedure without further complications.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Indice: LILACS Sujet Principal: Néphrostomie percutanée / Calculs rénaux Type d'étude: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limites du sujet: Adult / Female / Humans / Male langue: En Texte intégral: Int. braz. j. urol Thème du journal: UROLOGIA Année: 2016 Type: Article

Texte intégral: 1 Indice: LILACS Sujet Principal: Néphrostomie percutanée / Calculs rénaux Type d'étude: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limites du sujet: Adult / Female / Humans / Male langue: En Texte intégral: Int. braz. j. urol Thème du journal: UROLOGIA Année: 2016 Type: Article