Ultra-low CONtraSt PCI vs conVEntional PCI in patients of ACS with increased risk of CI-AKI (CONSaVE-AKI)

ABSTRACT

Objectives: This prospective, randomized study assessed short-term outcomes and safety of ultra-low contrast percutaneous coronary intervention(ULC-PCI) vs conventional PCI in high risk for contrast induced acute kidney injury(CI-AKI) patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome(ACS). Background: Patients at an increased risk of developing CI-AKI can be identified prior to PCI based on their pre-procedural risk scores. ULC-PCI is a novel contrast conservation strategy in such high risk patients for prevention of CI-AKI. Methods: 82 patients undergoing PCI for ACS were enrolled having estimated glomerular filtration rate(eGFR) < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 and moderate to very high pre-procedural risk of developing CI-AKI as calculated by Maioli risk calculator. They were randomized into two groups of 41 patients each of ULCPCI (contrast volume patient's eGFR) and conventional PCI (contrast volume 3xpatient's eGFR). Primary end point was development of CI-AKI. Results: Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar between groups. Primary outcome of CI-AKI occurred more in patients of the conventional PCI group [7 (17.1%)] than in the ULC PCI group [(0 patients), p ¼ 0.012]. Contrast volume (41.02 (±9.8) ml vs 112.54 (±25.18) ml; P < 0.0001) was markedly lower in the ULC-PCI group. No significant difference in secondary safety outcomes between two study arms at 30 days. IVUS was used in 17% patients in ULC PCI. Conclusion: ULC-PCI in patients with increased risk of developing CI-AKI is feasible, appears safe, and has the potential to decrease the incidence of CI-AKI specially in resource limited setting such as ours where coronary imaging by IVUS is not possible in every patient.