Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Laparoscopic versus mini-lap cholecystectomy for gallstone disease.
Article Dans Anglais | IMSEAR | ID: sea-64742
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To compare the outcome of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and mini-lap cholecystectomy (MC) in patients with symptomatic gallstone disease.

METHOD:

One hundred patients undergoing LC (50) or MC (50) were evaluated for duration of surgery, morbidity, need for analgesia, duration of hospitalization and interval to return to normal work.

RESULTS:

The mean operative time was significantly longer in the LC group (94 +/- 17 vs 129 +/- 33 min; p < 0.05). The rate of morbidity and conversion to open surgery were similar in the two groups. Patients in the MC group required more oral analgesia (p = ns). The mean post-operative hospital stay in this group was 3.3 +/- 1.5 days as compared to 3.3 +/- 2.7 days in the LC group (p = ns). Patients in the LC group took the same time to return to normal work (19.1 +/- 3.2 days) as those in the MC group 19.5 +/- 5.4 days (p = ns).

CONCLUSION:

MC and LC are comparable procedures for treatment of gallstone disease in our country.
Sujets)
Texte intégral: Disponible Indice: IMSEAR (Asie du Sud-Est) Sujet Principal: Complications postopératoires / Facteurs temps / Femelle / Humains / Mâle / Cholécystectomie / Lithiase biliaire / Études prospectives / Cholécystectomie laparoscopique / Adulte d&apos;âge moyen Type d'étude: Étude observationnelle langue: Anglais Année: 1996 Type: Article

Documents relatifs à ce sujet

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texte intégral: Disponible Indice: IMSEAR (Asie du Sud-Est) Sujet Principal: Complications postopératoires / Facteurs temps / Femelle / Humains / Mâle / Cholécystectomie / Lithiase biliaire / Études prospectives / Cholécystectomie laparoscopique / Adulte d&apos;âge moyen Type d'étude: Étude observationnelle langue: Anglais Année: 1996 Type: Article