Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Ritodrine hydrochloride alone and Combined Treatment with Magnesium sulfate in the Management of Preterm Labor / 대한산부인과학회잡지
Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology ; : 1991-1995, 2002.
Article Dans Coréen | WPRIM | ID: wpr-114681
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of the ritodrine hydrochloride alone with combined treatment with magnesium sulfate in the management of preterm labor.

METHODS:

One hundred thirty three singleton pregnancies with preterm labor were treated with either ritodrine hydrochloride (n=97) or ritodrine hydrochloride and magnesium sulfate (n=36). The principal outcomes assessed were delay of duration, maternal-fetal side effects, and fetal outcome.

RESULTS:

The treatment to delivery time was not statistically different between the ritodrine group and the combined magnesium sulfate group (mean+/-SD 10.7+/-13.0 days, 8.6+/-9.1 days, respectively). The proportion delivered after 48 hours, 72 hours, or 7 days was also not statistically different between two groups (29% vs. 22%, 40% vs. 39%, 60% vs. 64%, respectively). No statistical difference was found in the side effects of treatment or fetal outcomes.

CONCLUSION:

There was no significant difference in efficacy and safety between ritodrine hydrochloride and combined treatment with magnesium sulfate in the management of preterm labor.
Sujets)

Texte intégral: Disponible Indice: WPRIM (Pacifique occidental) Sujet Principal: Ritodrine / Travail obstétrical prématuré / Magnésium / Sulfate de magnésium Limites du sujet: Grossesse langue: Coréen Texte intégral: Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Année: 2002 Type: Article

Documents relatifs à ce sujet

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texte intégral: Disponible Indice: WPRIM (Pacifique occidental) Sujet Principal: Ritodrine / Travail obstétrical prématuré / Magnésium / Sulfate de magnésium Limites du sujet: Grossesse langue: Coréen Texte intégral: Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Année: 2002 Type: Article