Problems and future directions for quality evaluation of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service
Journal of the Korean Medical Association
;
: 176-178, 2015.
Article
Dans Coréen
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-138263
ABSTRACT
In 2014, there were disagreements between the Value Incentive Program (VIP) of the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) and academic societies. The primary differences of opinion arose over acute myocardial infarction and stroke, which are the first disease targets of the VIP. The quality of healthcare is one of the three components of the iron triangle in healthcare policy. Improving the quality of care requires effort from both internal approach(medical community) and external approach. The scope of HIRA for improving and monitoring the quality of care could be widened because (as of 2012) HIRA deals with only 16 items of quality improvement and assessment; does not monitor the total scope of medical services, patient safety, and patient experiences; and the VIP of HIRA is contains solely a quality dimension without a cost dimension. Therefore, HIRA should cooperate with medical communities to effectively improve the quality of care and expand procedures for quality improvement, assessment, and monitoring. HIRA must keep in mind that, with regard to improvement of quality of care, its role is not regulatory in nature, but cooperative.
Texte intégral:
Disponible
Indice:
WPRIM (Pacifique occidental)
Sujet Principal:
Qualité des soins de santé
/
Accident vasculaire cérébral
/
Prestations des soins de santé
/
Amélioration de la qualité
/
Sécurité des patients
/
Assurance maladie
/
Fer
/
Motivation
/
Infarctus du myocarde
Type d'étude:
Études d'évaluation
Limites du sujet:
Humains
langue:
Coréen
Texte intégral:
Journal of the Korean Medical Association
Année:
2015
Type:
Article
Documents relatifs à ce sujet
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS