Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Difference in Graft Rejection between Two Corneal Preservation Methods(Moist Chamber vs Optisol)
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society ; : 1340-1344, 1998.
Article Dans Coréen | WPRIM | ID: wpr-148096
ABSTRACT
To know the difference in graft rejection after corneal transplantation between moist chamber and Optisol(Chiron Co. Irvine, CA, U.S.A.) as cornea preservation methods, we compared two groups involving 50 patients(71 eyes) who had undergone partially penetrating keratoplasty (PPKP) for the treatment of keratoconus or corneal dystrophy from 1991 to 1995. The graft rejection had occurred in 10 of 40 eyes(25%) in moist chamber group and 9 of 31 eyes(29%) in Optisol group, and the cases of permanent corneal opacity after rejection were 5 of 40 eyes(12.5%), 3 of 31 eyes(9.7%) respectively. No difference in the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05). We found the fact that the difference did not exist in the results from graft rejection after PPKP using moist chamber method for short preservation period, or Optisol method for the relatively long period allowing serological and immunological screen test.
Sujets)

Texte intégral: Disponible Indice: WPRIM (Pacifique occidental) Sujet Principal: Transplantation de cornée / Kératoplastie transfixiante / Cornée / Opacité cornéenne / Transplants / Rejet du greffon / Kératocône langue: Coréen Texte intégral: Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society Année: 1998 Type: Article

Documents relatifs à ce sujet

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS

Texte intégral: Disponible Indice: WPRIM (Pacifique occidental) Sujet Principal: Transplantation de cornée / Kératoplastie transfixiante / Cornée / Opacité cornéenne / Transplants / Rejet du greffon / Kératocône langue: Coréen Texte intégral: Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society Année: 1998 Type: Article