Safeguarding the Integrity of Science Communication by Restraining 'Rational Cheating' in Peer Review
Journal of Korean Medical Science
;
: 1450-1452, 2014.
Article
Dans Anglais
| WPRIM
| ID: wpr-174933
ABSTRACT
Peer review is the pillar of the integrity of science communication. It is often beset with flaws as well as accusations of unreliability and lack of predictive validity. 'Rational cheating' by reviewers is a threat to the validity of peer review. It may diminish the value of good papers by unfavourable appraisals of the reviewers whose own works have lower scientific merits. This article analyzes the mechanics and defects of peer review and focuses on rational cheating in peer review, its implications, and options to restrain it.
Texte intégral:
Disponible
Indice:
WPRIM (Pacifique occidental)
Sujet Principal:
Sociétés médicales
/
Évaluation de la recherche par les pairs
langue:
Anglais
Texte intégral:
Journal of Korean Medical Science
Année:
2014
Type:
Article
Documents relatifs à ce sujet
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS